S. Sorger
To Win
D. Masur
To Win
Jan Satral vs Daniel Masur Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L L W L L L
Form
W L L L L L L L L LHead-To-Head: Satral 1 - 1 Masur
They have played 4 sets in total, with Satral winning 2 and Masur winning 2. The last match between Satral and Masur was at the Greece F9, 20-10-2014, First, Hard with Daniel Masur getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jan Satral | 1 |
| Daniel Masur | 1 |
Greece F9(20-10-2014)
6
3
6
4
| Satral | Stats | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 8% (1-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 446 |
| 136 | Highest Rank | 176 |
| 34 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 15 |
| 59% (325-224) | Career Total W/L | 57% (401-307) |
| $103,388 | Career Prize Money | $156,200 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
27 Apr 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Khachanov VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Pegula VS Uchijima PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| 6-3 7-5 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 20 | Games Won | 20 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jan Satral Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Mateusz Terczynski
Player
Jan Satral
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Duda
Player
Jan Satral
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pavel Nejedly
Player
Jan Satral
48%
(
13 of
27)
1st Serve %
46%
(
12 of
26)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
37
Total Points Won
16
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Satral
Player
Petr Vojtech
48%
(
29 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eduard Esteve Lobato
Player
Jan Satral
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Jan Satral
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
7 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
42
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Satral
Player
Frane Nincevic
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Satral
Player
Roi Ginat
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve %
48%
(
15 of
31)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
12
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
view more
Daniel Masur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Daniel Masur
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
11
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
15 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Daniel Masur
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
26%
(
6 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Daniel Masur
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Daniel Masur
45%
(
45 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
14
Aces
7
12
Double Faults
2
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
47%
(
26 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
98
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tom Paris
Player
Daniel Masur
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
76%
(
53 of
70)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Daniel Masur
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Marionneau
Player
Daniel Masur
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
15
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
92%
(
36 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
20%
(
11 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-7(2) 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Daniel Masur
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
77%
(
57 of
74)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (325/224) | Win/Loss | 57% (401/307) |
| 58% (732/530) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (925/746) |
| 53% (6209/5462) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8411/7679) |
| 60% (69/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (87/69) |
| 59% (200/140) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (143/115) |
| 61% (55/35) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (162/110) |
| 25% (1/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 41% (9/13) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 1626 | Aces Total | 2934 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1000 | Total Double Faults | 1863 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:19:24 |
| 556.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 511.37 |
| 56% (13052/23108) | 1st Serve % | 64% (26781/41833) |
| 71% (9249/13052) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (19084/26781) |
| 49% (4899/10055) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7376/15052) |
| 44% (1021/2299) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1614/3923) |
| 41% (9437/23150) | Return Points Win % | 39% (16227/42074) |
| 55% (11/9) | Slam W/L | 43% (10/13) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 38% (3/5) | Main Tour W/L | 29% (12/30) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (107/97) | Challenger W/L | 52% (191/175) |
| 65% (204/111) | Futures W/L | 68% (187/87) |
| 59% (318/536) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (391/694) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (3/6) |
| 56% (75/133) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (121/254) |
| 49% (82/169) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (128/257) |
| 87% (323/280) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (408/331) |
| 13% (323/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (408/76) |
| 20% (225/44) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (299/66) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
